Fault handling for location services requests

ABSTRACT

A cellular network may provide location services so that clients such as public service access points (PSAPs) can obtain locations of mobile devices. A location request is received first by a Gateway Mobile Location Center (GMLC), which responds by querying a Mobility Management Entity (MME). The MME is configured to query a Serving Mobile Location Center (SMLC) for the location. In some cases, the SMLC fail to respond or may respond with an error indication. In response to certain types of errors, the MME is configured to attempt to obtain the requested location from an alternate SMLC, rather than reporting an error back to the GMLC. Status information is maintained by the MME to keep track of any SMLCs that have returned errors, and these SMLCs are avoided when processing further requests.

BACKGROUND

The ability to access emergency response services by dialing a reservedemergency telephone number, such as 911 in the United States, is a vitalcomponent of public safety and emergency preparedness. In the UnitedStates, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has established aset of rules and regulations that require mobile communication providersto deliver enhanced emergency services to their subscribers. Inparticular, mobile communication providers are, in many circumstances,required to provide a current location of a 911 caller to emergencyservices.

There are also other situations where it is useful to know the locationof a device. For example, various location-based services may utilizelocation information to provide services relating to marketing,navigation, social media check-ins, billing, geotagging, etc.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The detailed description is described with reference to the accompanyingfigures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference numberidentifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. Theuse of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similaror identical components or features.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating relevant components of anenvironment in which the described techniques may be implemented.

FIG. 2 is a diagram of an example call flow, illustrating a sequence ofcommunications that occur when providing location services.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating an example method of handlinglocation requests.

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an example method of managingstatus information relating to location servers.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an example computing device that may beconfigured to implement various components shown in FIG. 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The described implementations provide devices, systems, and methods usedwithin a cellular communications network to allow location-basedservices to obtain locations of communication devices within thenetwork.

In accordance with techniques that are described in more detail below, aclient entity may at times need to obtain the location of a mobiledevice or other cellular communication device. A Public Safety AccessPoint (PSAP) is an example of a client entity that uses locationservices of a cellular communications network when responding toemergencies, such as when responding to 911 calls.

To obtain the location of a particular user equipment (UE), a LocationServices (LCS) client sends a request to a server that is referred to asa Gateway Mobile Location Center (GMLC). The GMLC is responsible forcommunicating with LCS clients, but is dependent on location servers,referred to as Serving Location Centers (SMLCs) to obtain UE locations.

Upon receiving a location request, the GMLC sends a correspondingrequest to a Mobile Management Entity (MME) of the communicationnetwork. The MME then sends a corresponding request to an SMLC.

In some cases, the SMLC may fail to return the requested location. Insome cases, for example, the SMLC may respond to the request from theMME, but may indicate that an error or failure occurred. In other cases,it may happen that no response is received from the SMLC in response tothe request from the MME.

In the case of a failure such as this, instead of reporting an error tothe GMLC, the MME may be configured to submit a second location requestto another SMLC. In some cases, the other SMLC may be successful inproviding the location of the specified mobile device, and the MME canreturn the location to the requesting GMLC, from where it is returned tothe LCS client.

In some embodiments, the MME may maintain status information for one ormore potentially available SMLCs, 0

The described techniques prevent the situation in which locationrequests to a GMLC may repeatedly fail because an MME continues to querythe same, failing SMLC. Instead, the MME may try one or more additionalSMLCs in an attempt to obtain the requested location, and in the futuremay avoid requests to the failing SMLC.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example environment 100 within which the describedtechniques may be implemented. In FIG. 1, a mobile, cellularcommunication device 102, also referred to as user equipment or UE 102,communicates through a base station 104 with a core network 106 of acellular communications system. The core network 106 is configured toprovide location information to multiple location clients 108, of whicha single location client 108 is shown in FIG. 1.

The UE 102 may comprise any type of device capable of wirelesscommunications with the base station 104 or other components of thecellular communication system, such as a cell phone, a smartphone, acomputer, a tablet computer, an automotive control/monitoring system,etc.

The core network 106 may, as an example, comprise a GSM network, such asan Evolved Packet Core (EPC) network as used in Long-Term Evolution(LTE) networks. Relevant components of the core network 106 include oneor more Mobility Management Entities (MMEs) 110, multiple Serving MobileLocation Centers (SMLCs) 112, and a Gateway Mobile Location Center(GMLC) 114.

The MMEs 110 of the core network 106 are signaling nodes that areresponsible for registering UEs, selecting appropriate gateways, routingcommunications between components, etc. Most relevant to thisdiscussion, an MME 110 receives and responds to location requestsregarding individual UEs.

An SMLC 112 is a node within the core network 106 that determines thegeographic position of a specified mobile device, based on signalcharacteristics and/or other available information. In an EPC network,the SMLC 112 may be referred to as an Evolved SMLC, or e-SMLC. The SMLC112 may use various techniques for determining device position, and insome cases may communicate with the UE 102 for assistance in determiningthe location of the UE 102. Locations provided by SMLCs may be estimatedlocations, and may have varying degrees of specificity and/or accuracy.

The core network 106 may have multiple SMLCs, of which four SMLCs 112are shown in FIG. 1, designated by reference numerals 112(a), 112(b),112(c), and 112(d). The core network 106 provides networkedcommunications between the various components, including between the MME110 and the multiple SMLCs 112.

The GMLC 114 is an interface to multiple external location clients. TheGMLC 114 can be queried by the location client 108 to obtain the currentlocation of a specified UE. In operation, the GMLC 114 contacts the SMLC112, through an MME 110, to obtain the location of the UE 102. In someenvironments, the GMLC 114 may be referred to as an LCS server.

The location client 108 may comprise any of various devices, components,and/or entities. For example, location clients may include Public SafetyAccess Points (PSAPs) or other entities that receive, process, and/orrespond to emergency calls such as 911 calls. Other location clients mayinclude web services, device applications, and so forth. Some types oflocation clients may be referred to as Location Services (LCS) orLocation-Based Services (LBS). The UE 102 itself, or applicationsrunning on the UE 102, may at times query the location service 114 inorder to determine its own location, and may therefore act as a locationclient.

The environment 100 may include additional components, systems, and/orfunctions that are involved in communications relating to receiving andresponding to location requests.

The arrows of FIG. 1 represent typical communication paths between theillustrated components. Dashed arrows represent available alternatecommunication paths. Generally, the location client 108 queries the GMLC114 for location information. The GMLC 114 responds by querying the MME110, which in turn queries the SMLC 112(a).

In practice, the MME 110 may query any of multiple available SMLCs 112to obtain the current location of the UE 102. In accordance withtechniques described herein, the MME 110 may query multiple SMLC untilone of the SMLCs is able to provide the requested location.

In certain embodiments, the MME 110 may maintain status information 116that indicates which of the SMLCs have failed to provide a requestedlocation in response to a corresponding request. These SMLCs arereferred to herein as disqualified SMLCs. Before sending a locationrequest to an SMLC, the MME 110 may examine the status information 116to identify an SMLC that is not currently disqualified, and then sendthe request to that SMLC.

FIG. 2 illustrates a high-level call flow that may be implemented by thecomponents of FIG. 1 for responding to location requests. In FIG. 2,communicating components or entities are listed along the top, withrespectively corresponding vertical lines extending downward.Communications are indicated by arrows that extend horizontally from andto the vertical lines corresponding to the entities from which thecommunications originate and terminate, respectively. Communicationsoccur in order from top to bottom. An individual communication or set ofcommunications is indicated by a corresponding reference numeral alongthe left side of the figure, horizontally aligned with the arrow orarrows representing the communication.

Note that FIG. 2 illustrates the most relevant communications and mayomit other communications that occur in practice but are less relevantto the topics at hand. Such other communications may includecommunications that both precede and follow the illustratedcommunications, communications that occur in time between theillustrated communications, and communications that occur betweencomponents or entities that are not specifically shown.

The call flow of FIG. 2 will be described in context of the environmentshown in FIG. 1, although the call flow may also be implementeddifferent types of networks.

At 202, the location client 108 sends a Location Service Request to theGMLC 114. The Location Service Request specifies a target UE identity,among other information. The Location Service Request, as well as othercommunications between the location client 108 and the GMLC 114, arespecified by 3GPP Technical Specification TS 23.271.

At 204, the GMLC 114 responds by sending a Provide Subscriber LocationRequest to the MME 110. The Provide Subscriber Location Request againspecifies a target UE identity, corresponding to the target UE specifiedby the Location Service Request from the location client 108. TheProvide Subscriber Location Request, as well as other communicationsbetween the GMLC 114 and the MME 110, are specified by 3GPP TechnicalSpecification TS 29.172.

At 206, the MME 110 sends an LCS-AP Location Request to one of the SMLCs112(a), which will be referred to as the first SMLC 112(a). The LCS-APLocation Request and other communications between the MME 110 and theSMLC 112(a) are specified by 3GPP Technical Specification TS 29.171. TheLCS-AP Location Request specifies the target UE 102, among otherinformation.

For purposes of discussion, it will be assumed that the first SMLC112(a) is unable to obtain the requested location and instead returnserror information in an LCS-AP Location Response. The error informationmay include one or more cause codes indicating the types of errorsencountered by the first SMLC 112(a) when attempting to obtain andprovide the requested location.

At 210, the MME sends a second LCS-AP Location Request to another SMLC112, which is assumed in this example to be the second SMLC 112(b).

At 212, the second SMLC 112(b) returns an LCS-AP Location Response,indicating the location of the specified UE 102. This assumes that thesecond SMLC 212(b) is successful in obtaining an estimation of thelocation of the specified UE 102.

At 214, the MME 110 returns a Provide Subscription Location Response tothe GMLC 114, indicating the location specified by the second SMLC112(b).

At 216, the GMLC 114 returns a Location Service Response to the locationclient 108, indicating the location as provided by the GMLC 114.

FIG. 3 shows an example method 300 that may be performed by a mobilemanagement component, such as the MME 110 of FIG. 1, for handlinglocation requests.

An action 302 comprises receiving a request for a location of a UE suchas a cellular communication device. In the described embodiments, theaction 302 may comprise receiving, from the GMLC 114, a ProvideSubscription Location Request, requesting the location of the UE 102.

An action 304 comprises identifying a location server that is notcurrently disqualified as a provider of location services. In thedescribed embodiments, the location server is identified from the SMLCs112, based at least in part on the status information 116 that ismaintained by the MME 110. As will be described below, the statusinformation 116 for a particular SMLC indicates that an individual SMLCis disqualified in certain situations where there has been a failure toreceive a requested location from the SMLC.

An action 306 comprises requesting the location of the UE from theidentified location server. In the described embodiments, the action 306may comprise sending a Location Request to the first SMLC 112(a),requesting the location of the UE 102.

An action 308 comprises determining whether the location of the UE hasbeen received from the location server, or if instead the MME has failedto receive the location from the location server. In some cases, theaction 308 may comprise receiving a Location Response from the SMLC 112and determining whether the Location Response indicates a location or ifinstead the Location Response specifies an error or other failure. Insome cases, it may be that no response is received from the locationserver, which is also considered to be a failure.

In response to determining that a location has been received from thelocation server, an action 310 is performed of returning the location ofthe UE 102 to the requesting GMLC 114 as a response to the requestreceived in the action 302. In the described embodiments, the action 310comprises sending a Provide Subscription Location Response to the GMLC114, where the Provide Subscription Location Response specifies thelocation of the UE as specified by the location server.

In response to determining in the action 308 that there is has been afailure to receive the location of the UE from the location server, anaction 312 is performed of determining whether the failure is due to oneor more pre-designated causes. The action 312 may be performed in thedescribed embodiments by referencing one or more cause codes that arespecified by the Location Response, in situations where the LocationResponse fails to return the requested location.

Cause codes specified by Location Responses from an SMLC are categorizedgenerally as relating to (a) Radio Network Layer, (b) Transport Layer,(c) Protocol, and (d) Miscellaneous. Of these, the MME 110 is configuredto treat Miscellaneous errors as being specific to the SMLC 112 fromwhich the cause code is received, and the pre-designated causescorrespond to these cause codes. Specifically, in some embodiments, thepre-designated cause codes may comprise, as specified by 3GPP TechnicalSpecification TS 29.171.7.4.16:

Processing Overload;

Hardware Failure; and

Operations and Maintenance Intervention.

These codes correspond to causes that are likely unique to the SMLC orthat are not likely to be encountered with other SMLCs. Inimplementation, the MIME may be dynamically configurable, so thatdifferent or additional cause codes can be pre-designated in differentsituations.

If the failure is not due to any of the pre-designated causes, an action314 is performed of returning an error indication, including anindication or description of the failure, as a response to the requestthat was received in 202. In the described embodiments, the action 314may comprise sending a Provide Subscription Location Response to therequesting GMLC 114, indicating that there was an error in obtaining therequested location and in some cases also indicating information aboutthe error.

In response to determining that the failure is due to the one or morepre-designated causes, an action 316 is performed. The action 316comprises changing the status information 116 to indicate that thelocation server to which the request was sent in the action 306 iscurrently disqualified as a provider of location services.

The actions are iterated, with each subsequent iteration starting at theaction 304 of identifying a location server. During a first iteration, alocation request is sent to a first location server. If there is afailure to obtain the location and the cause of the failure is one ofthe pre-designated causes, a second iteration is performed. During thesecond iteration, a second location request is sent to a second,alternate location server. This is repeated until either a location isreceived or until a cause code is received that doesn't correspond toone of the pre-designated causes. In practice, there may be a limit tohow many iterations are performed before returning an error message tothe requesting GMLC 114.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example method 400 that may be performed by themobile management component to manage the status information 116regarding disqualified location servers. The example method 400 isperformed repeatedly for each location server that has been designatedas being disqualified.

An action 402 comprises determining whether a predetermined length oftime has passed since the location server was designated as beingdisqualified. If the predetermined time period has not passed, theaction 402 is repeated. If the predetermined time period has passed, anaction 404 is performed of changing the status information to indicatethat the location server is no longer disqualified. This allows thelocation server to be used again, but if it is still unable to obtainlocations the method 300 will result in it being again disqualified.

FIG. 5 shows high-level components of an illustrative computing device500 such as may be used to implement various components of the corenetwork 106, such as servers, routers, gateways, administrativecomponents, etc. In particular, each of the base station 104, thelocation client 108, the MME 110, the SMLCs 112, and the GMLC 114 mayinclude and/or may be implemented by an instance of the computing device500.

In various embodiments, the computing device 500 may include at leastone processing unit 502 and system memory 504. Depending on the exactconfiguration and type of computing device, the system memory 504 may bevolatile (such as RAM), non-volatile (such as ROM, flash memory, etc.)or some combination of the two. The system memory 504 may include anoperating system 506, one or more program modules 508, and may includeprogram data 510. In the case of the MME 110, the program data 510 mayinclude data corresponding to the status information 116.

The computing device 500 may also include additional data storagedevices (removable and/or non-removable) such as, for example, magneticdisks, optical disks, or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated inFIG. 5 by storage 512.

Non-transitory computer storage media of the computing device 500 mayinclude volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable mediaimplemented in any method or technology for storage of information, suchas computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, orother data. The system memory 504 and storage 512 are all examples ofcomputer-readable storage media. Non-transitory computer-readablestorage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flashmemory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD)or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magneticdisk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other mediumwhich can be used to store the desired information and which can beaccessed by computing device 500. Any such non-transitorycomputer-readable storage media may be part of the computing device 500.

In various embodiment, any or all of the system memory 504 and storage512 may store programming instructions which, when executed, implementsome or all of the function functionality described above as beingimplemented by components the MME 110.

The computing device 500 may also have input device(s) 514 such as akeyboard, a mouse, a touch-sensitive display, voice input device, etc.Output device(s) 516 such as a display, speakers, a printer, etc. mayalso be included. The computing device 500 may also containcommunication connections 518 that allow the device to communicate withother computing devices.

Although features and/or methodological acts are described above, it isto be understood that the appended claims are not necessarily limited tothose features or acts. Rather, the features and acts described aboveare disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method performed by a Mobility ManagementEntity (MME) for a cellular communications network, the methodcomprising: receiving a Provide Subscription Location Request for alocation of a cellular communication device; sending a first LocationRequest to a first Serving Mobile Location Center (SMLC) to request thelocation of the cellular communication device; in response to sendingthe first Location Request, receiving a first Location Response from thefirst SMLC, wherein the first Location Response indicates a failure toobtain the location of the cellular communication device; in response tothe first Location Response indicating the failure and instead ofreporting an error to a Gateway Mobile Location Center (GMLC), sending asecond Location Request to a second SMLC, other than the first SMLC, torequest the location of the cellular communication device; receiving asecond Location Response from the second SMLC, wherein the secondLocation Response specifies the location of the cellular communicationdevice; and sending a Provide Subscription Location Response, whereinthe Provide Subscription Location Response specifies the location of thecellular communication device.
 2. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising: receiving another Provide Subscription Location Request foranother location of another cellular communication device; identifyingan alternate SMLC other than the first SMLC; and sending a thirdLocation Request to the alternate SMLC to request the other location ofthe other cellular communication device.
 3. The method of claim 1,further comprising: maintaining status information indicating whethereach of one or more SMLCs is currently disqualified as a provider oflocation services; and in further response to the first LocationResponse indicating the failure, changing the status information toindicate that the first SMLC is currently disqualified as a provider oflocation services.
 4. The method of claim 3, further comprising: sendinga third Location Request to request another location of another cellularcommunication device; receiving a third Location Response, wherein thethird Location Response indicates a cause of another failure to obtainthe other location of the other cellular communication device;determining whether the cause is due to one or more pre-designatedcauses; and in response to determining that the cause is due to the oneor more pre-designated causes, identifying an alternate SMLC based atleast in part on the status information indicating that the alternatelocation server is not currently disqualified as a provider of locationservices; and sending a fourth Location Request to the alternate SMLC torequest the other location of the other cellular communication device.5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving another ProvideSubscription Location Request for another location of another cellularcommunication device; sending a third Location Request to request theother location of the other cellular communication device; receiving athird Location Response, wherein the third Location Response indicates acause of another failure to obtain the other location of the othercellular communication device; determining whether the cause is due toone or more pre-designated causes; in response to determining that thecause is due to one or more pre-designated causes, identifying analternate SMLC; and sending a fourth Location Request to the alternateSMLC to request the other location of the other cellular communicationdevice.
 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving anotherProvide Subscription Location Request for another location of anothercellular communication device; sending a third Location Request torequest the other location of the other cellular communication device;receiving a third Location Response, wherein the third Location Responseindicates a cause of another failure to obtain the other location of theother cellular communication device; determining whether the cause isdue to one or more pre-designated causes; and in response to determiningthat the cause is not due to any of one or more pre-designated causes,sending another Provide Subscription Location Response, wherein theother Provide Subscription Location Response indicates the otherfailure.
 7. A mobility management component for use in a cellularcommunications network, the mobility management component comprising:one or more processors; one or more non-transitory computer-readablemedia storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed onthe one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to performactions comprising: receiving a request for a location of a cellularcommunication device; requesting the location of the cellularcommunication device from a first location server; in response torequesting the location of the cellular communication device,determining that there has been a failure to receive the location of thecellular communication device from the first location server; and inresponse to determining that there has been a failure to receive thelocation of the cellular communication device from the first locationserver and instead of reporting an error to a gateway mobile locationserver: (a) identifying a second location server as an alternative tothe first location server, and (b) requesting the location of thecellular communication device from the second location server.
 8. Themobility management component of claim 7, wherein: the mobilitymanagement component comprises a Mobile Management Entity (MME) of aGlobal System for Mobile (GSM) network; the request is received from aGateway Mobile Location Center Server (GMLC) of the GSM network, whereinthe gateway mobile location server comprises the GMLC; and each of thefirst and second location servers comprises a Serving Mobile LocationCenter (SMLC) of the GSM network.
 9. The mobility management componentof claim 7, the actions further comprising: receiving the location ofthe cellular communication device from the second location server; andreturning the location of the cellular communication device as aresponse to the received request.
 10. The mobility management componentof claim 7, the actions further comprising: receiving another requestfor another location of another cellular communication device;identifying an alternate location server other than the first locationserver; and requesting the other location of the other cellularcommunication device from the alternate location server.
 11. Themobility management component of claim 7, the actions furthercomprising: maintaining status information indicating whether each ofone or more location servers is currently disqualified as a provider oflocation services; and in further response to determining that there hasbeen a failure to receive the location of the cellular communicationdevice from the first location server, changing the status informationto indicate that the first location server is currently disqualified asa provider of location services.
 12. The mobility management componentof claim 11, the actions further comprising: prior to requesting thelocation of the cellular communication device from the first locationserver, identifying the first location server based at least in part onthe status information indicating that the first location server is notcurrently disqualified as a provider of location services.
 13. Themobility management component of claim 7, the actions furthercomprising: receiving another request for a location of another cellularcommunication device; requesting the location of the other cellularcommunication device from a third location server; determining thatthere has been another failure to receive the location of the othercellular communication device from the third location server;determining that the other failure is due to one or more pre-designatedcauses; and in response to determining that the other failure is due tothe one or more pre-designated causes, requesting the location of theother cellular communication device from a fourth location server. 14.The mobility management component of claim 7, the actions furthercomprising: receiving another request for another location of anothercellular communication device; requesting the other location of theother cellular communication device from a third location server;determining that there has been another failure to receive the otherlocation of the other cellular communication device from the thirdlocation server; determining that other failure is due to one or morepre-designated causes; in response to determining that the other failureis due to the one or more pre-designated causes, identifying analternate location server other than the third location server based onstatus information indicating that the alternate location server is notcurrently disqualified from providing location services; and requestingthe other location of the other cellular communication device from thealternate location server.
 15. The mobility management component ofclaim 7, the actions further comprising: receiving another request for alocation of another cellular communication device; requesting thelocation of the other cellular communication device from a thirdlocation server; determining that there has been another failure toreceive the location of the other cellular communication device from thethird location server; determining that the other failure is not due toany of one or more pre-designated causes; and in response to determiningthat the other failure is not due to any of the one or morepre-designated causes, returning an indication of the other failure. 16.A mobility management component for use in a cellular communicationsnetwork, the mobility management component comprising: one or moreprocessors; one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storingcomputer-executable instructions that, when executed on the one or moreprocessors, cause the one or more processors to perform actionscomprising: receiving a request for a location of a cellularcommunication device; based at least in part on status information thatindicates whether each of one or more location servers is currentlydisqualified as a provider of location services, identifying a firstlocation server that is not currently disqualified as a provider oflocation services; requesting the location of the cellular communicationdevice from the first location server; determining that there has been afailure to receive the location of the cellular communication devicefrom the first location server; in response to determining that therehas been a failure to receive the location of the cellular communicationdevice from the first location server and instead of reporting an errorto a gateway mobile location server: (a) identifying a second locationserver as an alternative to the first location server, and (b)requesting the location of the cellular communication device from thesecond location server; and in response to the determining, changing thestatus information to indicate that the first location server iscurrently disqualified as a provider of location services.
 17. Themobility management component of claim 16, wherein: the mobilitymanagement component comprises a Mobile Management Entity (MME) of aGlobal System for Mobile (GSM) network; the request is received from aGateway Mobile Location Center (GMLC) of the GSM network, wherein thegateway mobile location server comprises the GMLC; and each of the firstand second location servers comprises a Serving Mobile Location Center(SMLC) of the GSM network.
 18. The mobility management component ofclaim 16, the actions further comprising: determining that there hasbeen a failure to receive the location of the cellular communicationdevice from the second location server; based at least in part on thestatus information, identifying a third location server that is notcurrently disqualified as a provider of location services; requesting,from the third location server, the location of the cellularcommunication device; and returning the location of the cellularcommunication device as a response to the request.
 19. The mobilitymanagement component of claim 16, the actions further comprising:requesting, from another location server, another location of anothercellular communication device; determining that there has been anotherfailure to receive the other location of the other cellularcommunication device from the other location server; determining thatthe other failure is due to one or more pre-designated causes; and inresponse to determining that the other failure is due to the one or morepre-designated causes, changing the status information to indicate thatthe other location server is currently disqualified as a provider oflocation services.
 20. The mobility management component of claim 16,the actions further comprising: receiving another request for anotherlocation of another cellular communication device; requesting, fromanother location server, the other location of the other cellularcommunication device; determining that there has been another failure toreceive the other location of the other cellular communication devicefrom the other location server; determining that the other failure isnot due to any of one or more pre-designated causes; and in response todetermining that the other failure is not due to any of the one or morepre-designated causes, returning an indication of the other failure.